Nan-7 Planar Magnetic Headphone Review (2024)

This is a review, listening tests, EQ and detailed measurements of the Nan-7 open-back planar magnetic headphone. It is on kind loan from a member and costs US $940.

Nan-7 Planar Magnetic Headphone Review (1)

The headphone is quite comfortable to wear. Alas, it doesn't feel well to touch. All those stats and edges of just about everything is sharp. This made an already difficult job of swapping pads even more annoying (see below). The adjustment of the headband is the worst I have seen with major difficulty trying to raise or lower the cups. Company needs to really pay attention to deburring and general smoothing of machined/cut parts.

I was also not a fan of the balanced XLR cable as it is very stiff and heavy. A more manageable 4.4mm cable comes with it as well. You are provided no less than three sets of pads. The largest ones were on it and they did not fit quite well in the case insert, showing a crease.

Testing was performed on GRAS 45-CA measurement fixture.

Nan-7 Headphone Measurement
As usual we start with our frequency response measurement and comparison against our preference target:

Nan-7 Planar Magnetic Headphone Review (2)

Wow, what is going on here? We have those relative large jaggies but also a ton of noise. I could filter the latter out by smoothing to 1/6th octave but I shouldn't have to. Measurements were so odd that I doubted my fixture so I measured two other headphones and neither showed any of the noise or variations. Suspecting that thick and somewhat inflexible pad may be responsible for transmitting resonances, I went though the pain of swapping the pads to the thinnest ones (shown in the review picture) and got this:

Nan-7 Planar Magnetic Headphone Review (3)

While no panacea, we see fair bit of reduction in response noise, pointing the arrow at the design of the headphone. I forgot to measure distortion with thinner pads so let's go back to default thick pads:

Nan-7 Planar Magnetic Headphone Review (4)

Sharp peaks indicate resonances and we see plenty of that at higher amplitudes. Bass distortion is also high for a planar magnetic headphone:

Nan-7 Planar Magnetic Headphone Review (5)

Group delay was the worst I have seen, indicating many sound sources mixing:

Nan-7 Planar Magnetic Headphone Review (6)

Compared the Nan-6 headphone, company aimed to increase sensitivity and that, they have accomplished:

Nan-7 Planar Magnetic Headphone Review (7)

We are talking thee times lower voltage to achieve the same level of loudness. But perhaps during that optimization, the rest of the design was compromised.

Impedance is flat and punishingly low 15 ohm. That is also nearly 1/3 the impedance of Nan-6. So better have a high-current source to drive it.

By this time, I was going to close the review and not even listen to the headphone as there were clear regressions relative to Nan-6. Having a sore arm after taking two shots in the same arm did not help either. Still, I thought I do a quick listen.

Nan-7 Headphone Listening Tests and Equalization
It took all of 10 seconds to realize the sound of this headphone is much better than casual impression of the measurements. There was impressive and deep bass response, balancing the rest of the response tonally speaking. This was with the thin pad as noted. So I thought I see if I can improve with EQ and indeed I did:

Nan-7 Planar Magnetic Headphone Review (8)

I started with Band1. Not only did that bring female vocals forward as the should be, it also significantly improved their clarity. Without it, their voices were somewhat gritty in addition to being recessed. We could stop there and call it done but I also put in the other two filters. The little filter at 600Hz seemed to improve clarity a bit and 80 Hz pushed even more bass. Once there, I was quite happy listening to Nan-7. The jagged and noisy frequency response errors were almost forgotten. Spatial quality was near top of the class adding great enjoyment in tracks that so benefit from it such as Youngstown by Steve Strauss:

Combine all this with the comfort that the headphone brings, a good time was had listening to track after track.

Conclusions
There is no question that objectively the Nan-7 has a number of design flaws that jump out in measurements. Fortunately our hearing has rather poor frequency discrimination and what is seen in the measurements is not what we hear. Headphone already comes with 90% of the bass response that we like to see (unlike Nan-6) and the bit shortfall in lower treble can easily be fixed with EQ -- at least with the thinner pads. I am not a fan of the tactile feel of the headphone but while you are wearing it, it naturally is not an issue.

The objective flaws combine with rather high cost stops me from personally recommending the Nan-7. However with the bit of EQ, great enjoyment can be had so I can't fault you for buy it.

------------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.

Any donations are much appreciated using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/

Nan-7 Planar Magnetic Headphone Review (2024)

FAQs

Do planar headphones need a lot of power? ›

You can see that driving the magnetic planar headphones is not very difficult. If you want to push the drivers to their claimed 130dB limit, a bit more drive is needed, at 4V5 to 10V5 respectively for 20R and 110R. These voltage are why you see a recommendation to use a 5W amp, or a 10W amp.

What are planar earbuds? ›

Planar headphones lie between dynamic driver headphones (e.g., Sennheiser HD800) and Electrostatic headphones (e.g., Kingsound KS-H1, Stax, etc.). They use an ultra-fast-moving and super-thin diaphragm set between two magnets.

What are planar headphones good for? ›

So in summary, headphones with planar magnetic transducers often sound tighter, more controlled, and have better extension capabilities with less distortion for bass than dynamic drivers.

Why are planar magnetic headphones better? ›

Fast transient response: Planar magnetic drivers can react quickly to changes in the audio signal, providing a fast transient response that enhances clarity and detail. Wide frequency response: Planar magnetic headphones are capable of reproducing a wide range of frequencies, from deep bass to airy treble.

Do you need to burn in planar headphones? ›

It does see weird to have to burn in planars, however the Hifiman manual say to allow at least 150 hours to "break in".

Is planar better than dynamic? ›

If you do a lot of critical listening at home and want reference-level headphones, planar magnetic is ideal. Dynamic headphones make more sense if you value portability, compact size, and a closed-back design for travel or office use. Their smaller size and closed earcups are more discreet and isolate noise better.

What are the pros and cons of planar IEM? ›

The advantage is that the diaphragm can be made very large, and the force balance is distributed all over the diaphragm. These advantages give planar magnetic driver IEMs inherent advantages in dynamics and the amount of sound information. The disadvantage is that the sound unit is bulky, heavy, and difficult to drive.

How much power do headphones need? ›

So a quick rule-of- thumb is that you are going to need about 1/1000 as much power to drive your headphones as to drive your loudspeakers since both of their sensitivity ratings are similar (around 90- 110 dB SPL).

Do Planar IEMs need an amp? ›

Power Output: IEMs are generally sensitive and do not require a lot of power to drive them. Look for an amp that provides enough power to drive your IEMs to a comfortable listening volume without distortion or hissing. Excessive power can lead to unnecessary strain on the IEMs and potential damage.

Are planar headphones hard to drive? ›

While planar magnetic headphones can produce incredibly accurate sound, they also tend to be more expensive and harder to drive than dynamic headphones. One of the biggest advantages of planar magnetic headphones is their ability to produce a more accurate soundstage.

Do higher ohm headphones need more power? ›

In regards to high-end headphones, what does a higher ohm set mean compared to lower ohm sets, and what are the differences in sound quality? Higher ohms simply means more resistance, which in turn means the headphones need more power to be driven to the same volume than headphones with lower resistance.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Jonah Leffler

Last Updated:

Views: 5275

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (65 voted)

Reviews: 88% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Jonah Leffler

Birthday: 1997-10-27

Address: 8987 Kieth Ports, Luettgenland, CT 54657-9808

Phone: +2611128251586

Job: Mining Supervisor

Hobby: Worldbuilding, Electronics, Amateur radio, Skiing, Cycling, Jogging, Taxidermy

Introduction: My name is Jonah Leffler, I am a determined, faithful, outstanding, inexpensive, cheerful, determined, smiling person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.